The Conjugator
Conjugaison du verbe anglais
OUGHT TO CONSTITUTIONALISE

Verbe régulier : constitutionalise - constitutionalised - constitutionalised

Affirmation

Forme simple

Forme en V-ing

I ought to constitutionalise
you ought to constitutionalise
she ought to constitutionalise
we ought to constitutionalise
you ought to constitutionalise
they ought to constitutionalise
I ought to be constitutionalising
you ought to be constitutionalising
she ought to be constitutionalising
we ought to be constitutionalising
you ought to be constitutionalising
they ought to be constitutionalising

Perfect

Perfect en V-ing

I ought to have constitutionalised
you ought to have constitutionalised
she ought to have constitutionalised
we ought to have constitutionalised
you ought to have constitutionalised
they ought to have constitutionalised
I ought to have been constitutionalising
you ought to have been constitutionalising
she ought to have been constitutionalising
we ought to have been constitutionalising
you ought to have been constitutionalising
they ought to have been constitutionalising

Négation

Forme simple

Forme en V-ing

I ought not to constitutionalise
you ought not to constitutionalise
she ought not to constitutionalise
we ought not to constitutionalise
you ought not to constitutionalise
they ought not to constitutionalise
I ought not to constitutionalising
you ought not to constitutionalising
she ought not to constitutionalising
we ought not to constitutionalising
you ought not to constitutionalising
they ought not to constitutionalising

Perfect

Perfect en V-ing

I ought not to have constitutionalised
you ought not to have constitutionalised
she ought not to have constitutionalised
we ought not to have constitutionalised
you ought not to have constitutionalised
they ought not to have constitutionalised
I ought not to have been constitutionalising
you ought not to have been constitutionalising
she ought not to have been constitutionalising
we ought not to have been constitutionalising
you ought not to have been constitutionalising
they ought not to have been constitutionalising

Forme interrogative

Forme simple

Forme en V-ing

ought to I constitutionalise?
ought to you constitutionalise?
ought to she constitutionalise?
ought to we constitutionalise?
ought to you constitutionalise?
ought to they constitutionalise?
ought to I be constitutionalising?
ought to you be constitutionalising?
ought to she be constitutionalising?
ought to we be constitutionalising?
ought to you be constitutionalising?
ought to they be constitutionalising?

Perfect

Perfect en V-ing

ought to I have constitutionalised?
ought to you have constitutionalised?
ought to she have constitutionalised?
ought to we have constitutionalised?
ought to you have constitutionalised?
ought to they have constitutionalised?
ought to I have been constitutionalising?
ought to you have been constitutionalising?
ought to she have been constitutionalising?
ought to we have been constitutionalising?
ought to you have been constitutionalising?
ought to they have been constitutionalising?

Forme interro-négative

Forme simple

Forme en V-ing

ought I not to constitutionalise?
ought you not to constitutionalise?
ought she not to constitutionalise?
ought we not to constitutionalise?
ought you not to constitutionalise?
ought they not to constitutionalise?
ought I not to be constitutionalising?
ought you not to be constitutionalising?
ought she not to be constitutionalising?
ought we not to be constitutionalising?
ought you not to be constitutionalising?
ought they not to be constitutionalising?

Perfect

Perfect en V-ing

ought I not to have constitutionalised?
ought you not to have constitutionalised?
ought she not to have constitutionalised?
ought we not to have constitutionalised?
ought you not to have constitutionalised?
ought they not to have constitutionalised?
ought I not to have been constitutionalising?
ought you not to have been constitutionalising?
ought she not to have been constitutionalising?
ought we not to have been constitutionalising?
ought you not to have been constitutionalising?
ought they not to have been constitutionalising?