The Conjugator
Conjugaison du verbe anglais
OUGHT TO SUBSPECIALIZE

Verbe régulier : subspecialize - subspecialized - subspecialized

Affirmation

Forme simple

Forme en V-ing

I ought to subspecialize
you ought to subspecialize
he ought to subspecialize
we ought to subspecialize
you ought to subspecialize
they ought to subspecialize
I ought to be subspecializing
you ought to be subspecializing
he ought to be subspecializing
we ought to be subspecializing
you ought to be subspecializing
they ought to be subspecializing

Perfect

Perfect en V-ing

I ought to have subspecialized
you ought to have subspecialized
he ought to have subspecialized
we ought to have subspecialized
you ought to have subspecialized
they ought to have subspecialized
I ought to have been subspecializing
you ought to have been subspecializing
he ought to have been subspecializing
we ought to have been subspecializing
you ought to have been subspecializing
they ought to have been subspecializing

Négation

Forme simple

Forme en V-ing

I oughtn't to subspecialize
you oughtn't to subspecialize
he oughtn't to subspecialize
we oughtn't to subspecialize
you oughtn't to subspecialize
they oughtn't to subspecialize
I oughtn't to be subspecializing
you oughtn't to be subspecializing
he oughtn't to be subspecializing
we oughtn't to be subspecializing
you oughtn't to be subspecializing
they oughtn't to be subspecializing

Perfect

Perfect en V-ing

I oughtn't to have subspecialized
you oughtn't to have subspecialized
he oughtn't to have subspecialized
we oughtn't to have subspecialized
you oughtn't to have subspecialized
they oughtn't to have subspecialized
I oughtn't to have been subspecializing
you oughtn't to have been subspecializing
he oughtn't to have been subspecializing
we oughtn't to have been subspecializing
you oughtn't to have been subspecializing
they oughtn't to have been subspecializing

Forme interrogative

Forme simple

Forme en V-ing

ought to I subspecialize?
ought to you subspecialize?
ought to he subspecialize?
ought to we subspecialize?
ought to you subspecialize?
ought to they subspecialize?
ought to I be subspecializing?
ought to you be subspecializing?
ought to he be subspecializing?
ought to we be subspecializing?
ought to you be subspecializing?
ought to they be subspecializing?

Perfect

Perfect en V-ing

ought to I have subspecialized?
ought to you have subspecialized?
ought to he have subspecialized?
ought to we have subspecialized?
ought to you have subspecialized?
ought to they have subspecialized?
ought to I have been subspecializing?
ought to you have been subspecializing?
ought to he have been subspecializing?
ought to we have been subspecializing?
ought to you have been subspecializing?
ought to they have been subspecializing?

Forme interro-négative

Forme simple

Forme en V-ing

oughtn't I to subspecialize?
oughtn't you to subspecialize?
oughtn't he to subspecialize?
oughtn't we to subspecialize?
oughtn't you to subspecialize?
oughtn't they to subspecialize?
oughtn't I to be subspecializing?
oughtn't you to be subspecializing?
oughtn't he to be subspecializing?
oughtn't we to be subspecializing?
oughtn't you to be subspecializing?
oughtn't they to be subspecializing?

Perfect

Perfect en V-ing

oughtn't I to have subspecialized?
oughtn't you to have subspecialized?
oughtn't he to have subspecialized?
oughtn't we to have subspecialized?
oughtn't you to have subspecialized?
oughtn't they to have subspecialized?
oughtn't I to have been subspecializing?
oughtn't you to have been subspecializing?
oughtn't he to have been subspecializing?
oughtn't we to have been subspecializing?
oughtn't you to have been subspecializing?
oughtn't they to have been subspecializing?